Michael Moore Takes Audience Questions After ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’

Posted by admin on May 30th, 2010 and filed under franklin mortgage | 25 Comments »

Mike takes questions from the audience after the Minneapolis, Minnesota premiere of ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’ at the Lagoon Theater on Friday, September 18th, 2009.

Causing the revolt at http://www.michaelmoore.com/

Duration : 0:9:9


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses

  1. trakkaton Says:

    @aivilik
    You should …

    @aivilik
    You should watch a video before making a comment about it.
    That’s how it’s supposed to be.

  2. bluegsp Says:

    “just”? the …
    “just”? the conversation took place over a month ago.
    “owned”" The liberal jack never presented an argument to “own” anything. Do none of you liberals have any ability to think for yourself? Pathetic

  3. amielrox Says:

    you just got …
    you just got LiberOwned

  4. aivilik Says:

    Michael Moore is an …
    Michael Moore is an idiot. If you don’t pay the lender who bought your home for you because you didn’t have enough money to do it yourself, you should ABSOLUTELY be evicted from HIS property. There HAVE to be consequences for poor decision-making, else there is no incentive to make good decisions.

  5. aivilik Says:

    The central banks …
    The central banks are to blame AS MUCH AS the people borrowing money they couldn’t afford to pay back. The U.S. government pressured Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac to lend to high-risk borrowers, even though both lenders knew it was a bad idea. All of this was done as part of a plan to collapse the U.S. dollar. The plan was crafted by the same people who own the federal reserve in the U.S. and in other countries. They’ve also been behind most of the wars around the world over the last 100 years or so

  6. bluegsp Says:

    empty?!?!? You are …
    empty?!?!? You are the one who hasn’t said anything. Nice try though, come back if you are ever able to assemble an opinion or a thought. You are one of the biggest morons I have ever seen. I suggest taking a debate or speech class, you really are a pathetic loser! XD

  7. JustTheFax1 Says:

    You can try and …
    You can try and weasel out of it all you want, but in the end you still have no idea what you’re talking about, are terrified of facts, and don’t understand basic logic (or words for that matter).

    All this whining, and you still can’t admit that you’re just flat busted as being the empty balloon that you are… If I didn’t know any better, I would think that you were Bill Bellichick.

  8. bluegsp Says:

    Nope, complete …
    Nope, complete bullshit.
    You are the joke.
    I had to scroll down to over 2 months ago to even find a comment from you, and that never happened. In fact, you had nothing to add to the conversation then either. You are a sad pathetic little liberal that lives in a fantasy world. XD

  9. JustTheFax1 Says:

    Not a lot of room …
    Not a lot of room in your head for established facts, is there? But since you insist I repeat myself:

    I made a joke and you accused me of not knowing what a metaphor was. I pointed out that your comment was not a metaphor, but hyperbole and that you could check Websters Dictionary if you didn’t believe me. You said that only a liberal moron would say such a stupid thing. Hence: you think Webster’s dictionary is a liberal book. Basic logic.

    Guess you hate logic as much as you hate facts, huh?

  10. bluegsp Says:

    I think your silly …
    I think your silly little list is more reflective of the length of your vocabulary? When did I ever say Webster’s was liberal. You really can’t string two sentences together without lying, can you?
    You never have had anything to contribute to the debate, you just keep chiming in with this childish bullshit. You really are a liberal idiot.
    How sad.

  11. JustTheFax1 Says:

    Just to clarify: …
    Just to clarify: the new list of words you don’t understand the meaning of…

    Busted.
    Unhinged.
    Research.
    Debate.
    Argument.
    Strawman.
    Stupidity.
    Liberal.
    Metaphor/hyperbole (the difference between them)

    Just curious. You’ve already said that you consider Webster’s Dictionary to be a liberal source. What dictionary do you believe to be more accurate?

  12. bluegsp Says:

    You mean other than …
    You mean other than now? You really don’t have a grasp of the language do you, is English a second language for you? You have never successfully refuted any points I have made, you only rant on about where I get information. Your obsession with your defeat has revealed an OCD that you should seek help for. What a pathetic moron.

  13. JustTheFax1 Says:

    Please point out …
    Please point out the part where you have either dispatched, destroyed or embarrassed me. I’m the only one who’s making calm, rational points here. All you’ve done is throw a sad little tantrum and hurl insults with nothing to back anything you say up. And yet you accuse me of being the unhinged one. I’m not sure you understand what that word means either.

    Do we need to add that to the list of words you don’t understand too? Man this sucker is getting long.

  14. bluegsp Says:

    You are right, this …
    You are right, this is not a debate, I have already dispatched you and your shame has made you unhinged. And which “actual facts” have you addressed? You have been destroyed by me and now you want to go after my sources in a conversation that doesn’t involve you. you really are a pathetic liberal moron with out a life.
    Again, you have embarrassed yourself without a point and proved once again your stupidity.
    The only thing that is “busted” is your brain. XD

  15. JustTheFax1 Says:

    Plagiarism is not …
    Plagiarism is not research. Vomiting up talking points and calling people morons is not debating. (I’ll add those two words to the list you don’t understand as well)

    Let’s be clear. This is not a debate. This is a smackdown in which I have proven AGAIN that you have no clue what you’re talking about. It doesn’t surprise me that you find my posts “barely coherent” because they are fact-based. And you are terrified of actual facts.

    Busted is busted. And you kid, are BUSTED.

  16. bluegsp Says:

    You have proved …
    You have proved nothing moron, just because I know how to back up my position’s with research and evidence as I destroy liberal morons like you in debates where you are clearly over your head, demonstrates intelligence. Making up and talking out of your is a liberal trait that you demonstrate very astutely. your posts are barely coherent, let alone informational. XD

  17. JustTheFax1 Says:

    So proving that YOU …
    So proving that YOU have no clue what you’re talking about and just vomit up other people’s words as if they’re your own thoughts is a liberal trait? You sure that’s really the angle you want to take here?

    I’m starting to think we should add the words “stupidity” and “liberal” to the list of words you don’t know the meaning of.

  18. bluegsp Says:

    You are a complete …
    You are a complete idiot. You are right, you have never presented an argument, and these are words you obviously don’t understand. You have not “busted” anything but your own stupidity. You can always spot a liberal moron, they talk and talk but never say anything.
    It is amazing that you have to dig up a conversation that you were not involved in from a month ago and still have nothing to say about it.
    You need to get a life
    how pathetic!

  19. JustTheFax1 Says:

    So just to clarify, …
    So just to clarify, words you don’t know the meaning to:

    Busted.
    Argument.
    Strawman.
    Metaphor/hyperbole
    (the last was my particular favorite because when I explained the difference, you accused me – and by extension Webster’s Dictionary – of being a liberal moron)

    Hmmm… did I forget any?

  20. JustTheFax1 Says:

    You’re too stupid …
    You’re too stupid to even know when you’ve been busted.

    So YES. You’ve been busted. You were asked if you could explain something so you went out and copied an pasted something word for word from another source. That proves that YOU have no idea what you’re talking about.

    And no, I don’t call that an argument. YOU called it an argument, proving you don’t even know what an argument is. I call it proof. 1+1=2. And you are busted, humiliated, and 100% pwned.

    Man up and admit it.

  21. bluegsp Says:

    Busted? you call …
    Busted? you call that an argument? You are as stupid as they get. You have not said shit. You are the moron that is always humiliated. Get a clue and a life or just go back to commenting on how much you miss Micheal Jackson

  22. JustTheFax1 Says:

    BUSTED AGAIN!!!!!


    BUSTED AGAIN!!!!!

    I was just digging through some old emails when I thought it would be fun to see what was happening back on this thread again. Apparently what’s happening is you still have NO IDEA WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. And rather than do any thinking for yourself, you still just vomit up other peoples’ words as if they’re your own.
    This time it’s from: cluteinstitute [dot] com%2FPrograms%2FLas_Vegas_2009%2FArticle%2520356.pdf

    Don’t you get tired of being eternally humiliated? LOLOLOL!!!

  23. paex18 Says:

    Amazing.
    Amazing.

  24. connatiah Says:

    Excellent movie. …
    Excellent movie. Again Michael Moore tells it like it is, and has done a terrific job in doing so. Don’t shoot the messenger. Marcie Kaptur is a wonderful person that I have always admired. God bless them both for they seek the truth and speak it.

  25. bluegsp Says:

    As the economy …
    As the economy flourished, a flood of funds entered the CDS market. To accommodate these funds, the types of instruments covered by contracts expanded to include CDO which were often backed by pools of mortgages. In addition, the secondary market expanded as investors bought and sold CDS multiple times making bets on the underlying firms credit worthiness.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.